I feel it necessary, therefore, to state without any
equivocation or hesitation that neither in the Kitáb-i-Aqdas nor in the Book of
Bahá’u’lláh’s Covenant, nor even in the Tablet of the Branch, nor in any other
Tablet, whether revealed by Bahá’u’lláh or ‘Abdu’l Bahá, is there any authority
whatever for the opinion that inclines to uphold the so-called “mystic unity”
of Bahá’u’lláh and ‘Abdu’l Bahá, or to establish the identity of the latter
with His Father or with any preceding Manifestation. This erroneous conception
may, in part, be ascribed to an altogether extravagant interpretation of
certain terms and passages in the Tablet of the Branch, to the introduction
into its English translation of certain words that are either non-existent,
misleading, or ambiguous in their connotation. It is, no doubt, chiefly based
upon an altogether unjustified inference from the opening passages of a Tablet
of Bahá’u’lláh, extracts of which, as reproduced in the “Bahá’í Scriptures”,
immediately precede, but form no part of, the said Tablet of the Branch. It
should be made clear to every one reading those extracts that by the phrase
“the Tongue of the Ancient” no one else is meant but God, and that the term
“the Greatest Name” is an obvious reference to Bahá’u’lláh, and that “the
Covenant” referred to is not the specific Covenant of which Bahá’u’lláh is the
immediate Author and ‘Abdu’l Bahá the Center but that general Covenant which,
as inculcated by the Bahá’í teaching, God Himself invariably establishes with
mankind when He inaugurates a new Dispensation. “The Tongue” that “gives,” as
stated in those extracts, the “glad-tidings” is none other than the Voice of
God referring to Bahá’u’lláh, and not Bahá’u’lláh referring to ‘Abdu’l Bahá.
- Shoghi Effendi (‘The Dispensation of Baha’u’llah; included in ‘The World Order
of Baha’u’llah’)